Time for Clocks

March 7th, 2008

If we have any sort of collection, I would have to say we have a clock collection. I’ve always loved clocks, even before I married my third-generation jeweler/watchmaker husband. Jewelry, I could care less about (and he’s very thankful for that!) — but give me an antique clock any day. When I was a little kid, I dreamt about owning a grandfather clock one day. I don’t know why; I just loved them. I always loved the mantel clock that my paternal grandparents had in their farmhouse, even with the shakily redrawn letters on the face (dear old Grandpa!), as well as the anniversary clock my maternal grandparents had, even though Pete tells me most anniversary clocks use inferior quality movements (his shop won’t fix them).2008022801.jpg

We came to own this majestic grandfather clock, also known as a longcase or hall clock, through my best friend from college. Her sister actually owned the clock — she and her husband bought it at an estate sale, I think somewhere in Illinois. But they soon after moved to Arizona, so they left it in a corner at her father’s house. I had only ever seen the clock case: the movement, tubes and weights were tucked away in a box somewhere, but I loved loved LOVED the thing. I told her repeatedly that if she ever wanted to get rid of it, to call me.

One day, when her father finally got sick of it sitting around, she called me! Pete and I were already married at the time, but I don’t even know if he had ever seen it before. We went over to her father’s house and loaded it up into Ludwig von Vanagon (Pete’s 1981 VW Vanagon). It barely fit. When we got it home to our previous house and set it upright, it barely cleared the ceiling.

The case is made of mahogany solids and veneers. There are some dings and scratches, and a couple of areas where the veneer has chipped, so I’m sure that affects its value, but I don’t care. It’s a 9-tube chime and plays both Westminster and Whittington melodies. The sound is incredible, but it’s so loud that we have to turn it off most of the time (especially at night).

The minute Pete saw the movement he could tell that it was a good quality clock. It was in great condition and didn’t need much in cleaning and adjustment. Unfortunately we’ve scoured the piece for a manufacturer’s signature but never found any. The closest he could tell, and in talking with others, is that it was made by The Herschede Clock Company of Cincinnati, Ohio.

We believe our clock was made in the early 1900s. Herschede didn’t start making their own clock movements until 1911, so prior to that they imported the movements — usually from Germany — which may be the reason why there are no markings on our movement. I recently found a source for a Herschede catalog from the early 1900s, so I’m hoping to find our clock there. I’ll keep you posted.

2 Responses to “Time for Clocks”

  • I feel his pain on 400 day clocks! Seems like most of the ones I get in some fool has either cleaned the movement and neglected the mainspring (afraid or unwilling to remove it from the barrel), or lessened the locks on the escapement and then can’t figure out why it won’t stay running!

    As for your beautiful upright clock, I worked on the twin to that a year ago in May. As I recall it used an old Winterhalter (spelling is incorrect) movement. The movement will play Herschede under the table if it is the one I am thinking of-it has plates almost a quarter inch thick and heavy as sin! I think the pendulum rod on the one I did was invar, an inert alloy that won’t react to speak of with temperature changes.

    Enjoy it-it’s the Packard of clocks!

    Chaz

  • Chaz: Thanks so much for the information—it was extremely helpful! Yes, the movement is heavy as sin and does have the thick plates. I did find a Winterhalder clock online which looked fairly similar to ours, so I think you’re definitely on the right track. I’m curious as to why we wouldn’t find any sign of who manufactured it though. Any ideas?

Trackback URI Comments RSS

Leave a Reply